The Tashkent Files

The Tashkent Files

HitFeature film soundtrack
Director
Vivek Agnihotri
Studio
SP CineCorpSP CineCorp, Vivek Agnihotri CreatesVivek Agnihotri Creates
Release Date
11 April 2019
Running Time
144 min
Language
Hindi
Country
India
Budget
7.50 Cr
Box Office
20.84 Cr

Cast

Review

6.8/10Critic Score

Vivek Agnihotri's "The Tashkent Files" is a rare beast in Hindi cinema—a genuinely cerebral political thriller that refuses to spoon-feed its audience. The film's greatest strength lies in its refusal to provide easy answers. By assembling a diverse committee to investigate Lal Bahadur Shastri's mysterious death, Agnihotri creates a microcosm of competing ideologies and vested interests that mirrors India's own fractured relationship with its history. The screenplay thrives in these moments of conflict, where bureaucrats, historians, journalists, and politicians talk past each other, each clinging to their version of "truth." Naseeruddin Shah is reliably excellent as the pragmatist, while Mithun Chakraborty brings unexpected gravitas to his role. However, the film stumbles when it confuses ambiguity with depth—the final act's refusal to commit feels less like intellectual honesty and more like creative cowardice.

Where Agnihotri's direction truly shines is in the procedural mechanics of investigation itself. The courtroom-like proceedings have genuine tension, and the man-versus-system narrative carries weight that most of our cinema completely ignores. Yet the film's obsession with appearing "balanced" actually undermines its own arguments. You can feel Agnihotri desperately trying not to alienate either the establishment or the conspiracy theorists, which paradoxically makes the film feel toothless. For a story about uncovering suppressed truth, "The Tashkent Files" is odd

Arjun Nair, Bollyhits ↗

Storyline

So there's this journalist named Raagini who gets a mysterious call tipping her off about something really sketchy involving an old Indian Prime Minister who died in Tashkent back in 1966. She decides to dig into it, and before you know it, the government puts together this whole committee with her on it to look into what actually happened. The team includes all sorts of people—politicians, history buffs, scientists, and other reporters—basically everyone with a stake in figuring out the truth.

What makes it interesting is how these committee members absolutely clash with each other as they try to make sense of the evidence. They're throwing around all kinds of theories, pulling in Cold War stuff, talking about possible assassinations, and just generally disagreeing on what the real story is. It's like watching people try to solve a massive puzzle where nobody can quite agree on what the picture should look like.

By the end of the film, you're kind of left hanging because the main question doesn't really get answered. It's one of those movies that makes you think about how much governments should tell us and whether we can actually trust the information we get about historical events. It's definitely a thought-provoking watch that'll have you questioning a lot of things.

View source ↗

Related Movies